GREAT Proposals FAQs
Location of Questions and Answers:
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. What's the difference between the trainee allowance and the faculty allowance?
A. The GREAT award is a training grant and not a fellowship and, as such, is awarded to the UC Sponsor not the graduate student. The $10,000 trainee allowance is specifically allocated
for the student's expenses, not the sponsor's. The faculty allowance of $10,000 is at the discretion of the faculty sponsor(s). Both
categories are flexible as long as the budgeted items are clearly related to the trainee's training. In general, the trainee
allowance is meant to be for the trainee's training related expenses, e.g., a laptop computer, travel to a scientific meeting
related to the area of research, registration for symposium. The faculty allowance is for what the sponsor(s) deem(s) necessary
for the support of the trainee. For example, there may be lab expenses associated with the co-sponsor's lab that are not
included in the trainee allowance budget.
The trainee allowance funds are intended to be used to aid the trainee in the performance of his or her research project. The funds are not intended for personal use unconnected to the student's research and training (such as campus parking permit, athletic club membership). Also, funds may not be used to provide infrastructure such as office furniture. However, it was envisioned that such items as a laptop computer, which might be interpreted as personal item, could have a direct impact on the student's ability to do their research and would fall within the remit of training related discretionary funds. Ultimately, although GREAT provides broad-based guidelines, it is up to the discretion of the Sponsor in consultation with the trainee, as to how to appropriately expend these funds in support of the training project. Ownership of inventorial and non-inventorial equipment is determined by the equipment policy at the local campus.
|
 |
|
|
 |
2. |
Q. What graduate student fees can be included in the budget?
A. All graduate student fees, except nonresident tuition (NRT), may be included in the budget and paid by UC BREP GREAT funds.
|
 |
|
|
 |
3. |
Q. Under which budget category should we list graduate student fees?
A. All graduate student fees, except NRT, may be budgeted in the training related expenses category. Alternatively, the sponsor may
budget for graduate student fees from the faculty allowance category.
|
 |
|
|
 |
4. |
Q. Can registration fees and health insurance costs be covered under the faculty allowance?
A. Since registration and health insurance costs are part graduate student fees, then, yes, faculty sponsors may use their allowance for these training-related
expenses.
|
 |
|
|
 |
5. |
Q.
Our campus requires all of our students to act as teaching assistants for one quarter. During that quarter, the university pays half the regular stipend and fees for the student. How should we reflect this in the budget?
A. If the student must complete a TAship during the course of the GREAT award, the primary sponsor may ask for a one quarter deferment or extension of the award. The student should not receive compensation from the GREAT grant concurrently with TAship compensation.
|
 |
|
|
 |
6. |
Q. Should costs for travel to the yearly retreat be included in the budget?
A. Yes, the transportation costs for the GREAT trainee and at least one
sponsor to attend the GREAT retreat to be held annually in late October or early November at the Best Western Beach Resort in Monterey MUST be included in the budget. Lodging and meals at the retreat will be paid by the Program.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. Should indirect costs be included in the budget?
A. No, UC BREP is funded by the Office of the President with State of California funds. Therefore, indirect costs are not applicable.
|
 |
|
|
|
Q. The budget for this GREAT program is fairly straightforward. Do I still
need to go through the campus Office of Sponsored Projects and our department to configure a budget as per NIH/NSF grants?
A. The department chair must sign off on the proposal because his/her department
will administer the grant if funded. The Office of Sponsored Programs* must also sign off on the proposal. In addition to
verifying budgetary information, the sponsored programs office verifies that the P.I. is eligible to submit proposals, and they
maintain statistics on submitted proposals and funded grants for their campus. The proposal must be signed by the Dean of the
P.I.'s college or school only if it is a requirement of that college school.
* Please note that each University may be different in that the "Office of Sponsored Programs" may be located in the
University's Contracts and Grants Office or with the Office of Research. In either case, a signature must be received from
the office that approves training grant proposals on your specific campus. UCLA's Office of Sponsored Programs has stated that they do not wish to sign GREAT proposals.
|
 |
|
|
 |
8. B. |
Q. My campus graduate program office normally signs off on training grant
applications not the office of sponsored programs. What office should I use?
A. As this is a proposal submitted by the primary sponsor (principal investigator), it is processed
as a training grant; it is not a fellowship application. The process depends on your campus policies. It maybe
helpful to take the following paragraph describing the GREAT training program in more detail to the Office of Sponsored
Programs for clarification.
The Graduate Research and Education in Adaptive-Biotechnology (GREAT) awards are training grants provided by UC BREP to UC researchers
on the ten UC campuses and three national laboratories. They are awarded to principal investigators, as primary sponsors, who demonstrate that
they have created an environment for cross-disciplinary research and education. The quality of the trainers, the candidate and
the training environment is considered when awarding the grant to the primary sponsor. However, should the faculty or nominated
student leave the UC campus and if approved by the UCBREP Executive Committee, the training grant may follow them to another campus within
the UC System. If the faculty leaves the UC campus and is not remaining within the UC system or is not continuing with the
nominated student, then the training grant is terminated and any remaining funds revert to UCBREP. Specifically, the grant
funds the training environment created by the faculty member and is not a direct fellowship to the student. There is no case
where the grant would remain with the student if the faculty and student should split. Of course the student's new sponsor(s)
are free to apply for GREAT funding.
Selected Wording from the UC BREP GREAT Guidelines:
Direct transfer of funds from one graduate student to another is not permitted. Should the nominated GREAT graduate student
fail to accept the award, leave the university, change research direction, conduct research not approved by the Faculty Sponsor
or the GREAT Program's Executive Committee, then the unexpended funds will be returned to the University of California
Biotechnology Research and Education Program Office, which administers the GREAT Program. If the Faculty Sponsor(s) are able to
identify another candidate, they will have the opportunity to reapply to the GREAT Program's executive committee for
reconsideration of a new nominee. Any substantive changes in the project, such as changes in budget allocations, location,
Faculty Sponsor(s), project period, major project scope etc., require pre-approval of the GREAT Program's executive committee.
The University of California Biotechnology Research and Education Program Office must be notified of any potential changes as
soon as possible.
If your Office of Sponsored Programs needs more information, please have them contact us at (530) 752-8237.
|
 |
|
|
 |
9. |
Q. Where do I send the signature page?
A. Mail the signature page (due by February 2009) to:
GREAT Program
UC Biotechnology Research and Education Program
University of California 301 Life Sciences
One Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. Who submits the proposal?
A. The Primary Faculty Sponsor submits the proposal. |
 |
|
|
 |
11. |
Q. Do I need to send a printed copy of the proposal?
A. No, we do not want a printed copy of the proposal. We do need a printed copy of
the signature page.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. Can institutes or Multicampus Research Units (MRUs) or Organized Research
Units (ORUs) that are affiliated with a UC campus be recipients of the GREAT award, i.e. administer the grant?
A. Institutes, MRUs or ORUs that are affiliated with and administered through a UC campus may be recipients of the GREAT award through the Primary
Sponsor. The affiliated institute, MRU or ORU must use UC Office of the President (OP) accounts and funds. We must be able to
process an interlocation transfer of funds directly to the department, UC institute, UC MRU, or UC ORU. If the entity does not
use OP accounts and funds, the training grant award funds must go to the primary sponsor's academic home department at a UC campus.
Post award arrangements with the affiliated institute may be pursued through the affiliated UC campus
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. I'd like to include two letters from my collaborators in the appendix.
However, I am not sure what are the essential things that my collaborators need to include in the letter. Please advise.
A. Collaborators' letters should address the central points of the RFP, e.g,
cutting-edge theoretical and experimental research at the interface between the life sciences and the
chemical, computational, engineering, material, mathematical or physical sciences; interdisciplinary research training
environment; brightest young graduate student within UC system; rigor of training that prepares students for careers in
evolving interdisciplinary fields in industry, academia and government; potential positive impact of the project on the
California biotechnology economy; potential for securing industry or alternate funding. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. What is the difference between a cosponsor and mentor?
A. A cosponsor is substantially involved in the training of the graduate student and must demonstrate that they provide a training environment that satisfies the leading-edge, interdisciplinary requirements of the program. They must be actively engaged in the planning, execution and supervision of the proposed research year, and encourage the trainee to report the results of the research in scientific journals and meetings where the University of California Graduate Research and Education in Adaptive bio-Technology (GREAT) Training Program support is acknowledged.
For a single primary sponsor, a mentor or mentors--who will have less responsibility than a cosponsor--is required to satisfy the requisite cross-disciplinary exposure. Mentors provide exposure to the cross disciplinary component of the training. Mentor(s) must demonstrate interest by providing a biographical sketch and signature on the signature page of the pre-proposal. Mentors need not have UC PI status.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. Can the training candidate apply if he/she is applying to graduate school
for Fall 2007?
A. Yes. A UC faculty sponsor may nominate you if you are a graduate student
at the time of the award commencement, academic year 2008-09.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. What does the sentence "demonstrate the intent to seek matching funds"
mean?
A. The comment about "demonstrate the intent to seek matching funds" is to let
the sponsor know that the reviewers look favorably on any matching funds that maybe available to augment the training grant.
Matching is not required; it is looked favorably by the reviewers. Any matching, whether it is campus or biotechnology companies, is
encouraged. In addition, we want the students/and or professors to be willing to accompany UC BREP personnel on visits to
private sector companies who may be willing to fund some trainees. Sponsors do not have to secure matching funds but must be
willing to help UC BREP find funds.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. The instructions for the Project Narrative section request information
about the nature and location of necessary equipment and facilities. Do you want to know the building/room numbers and where
the equipment is kept?
A. Reviewers are looking for information that would help determine your
capability to provide this training. We do not need to know the room numbers and/or building where equipment is housed but as
similar to NSF and NIH, please detail and/or list the equipment and facilities appropriate to this training
project. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. Must I include the title and abstract of all current and pending support?
Is current and pending support included within the 8-page limit for the narrative, on a separate page, or as part of the PIs'
biographical sketches?
A. The research support section is not included in the 8-page narrative limit.
It should be included as part C in the faculty sponsor(s) and mentor(s) biographical sketches. In the research support section,
please include the person's role on the project, funding agency, project title, dates, and a brief summary (one or two
sentences) of the overall goals of the project. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. My understanding from the RFP guidelines is that figures, photos, and
graphics referenced in the narrative may be appended beyond the eight-page narrative limit; is that correct? What about
references?
A. Yes, it is correct that figures, graphics and photos may be appended and do
not count towards the eight-page narrative limit. References are not included in the eight-page limit. Where possible,
appendices should be added at the end of the narrative in order to be uploaded via the online submission system. If this is not possible, as in the case of original
letters of support, the original should be mailed along with the signature page.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. What do I do if I do not have all of the information on current and past
students for the Biosketch?
A. Reviewers are looking for information that would help determine the Sponsor's
capability to provide the training. Knowledge of current and past students is helpful in this endeavor. If you do not have all
of the specific information concerning each student then write "unknown" in the appropriate field. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Q. May I use a smaller font on my chart/graph/figure/photo caption?
A. The required font size is 11 point. However, the text needs to be legible -
the reason that 11 point arial is chosen is that it is considered the smallest acceptable level for clarity for most readers.
Remember if you use smaller font for captions and make it difficult for reviewers to read you may hurt rather than help your
prospects! You may use a different font but just keep in mind the reader has your fate in his/her hands!
|
|